OK This deserves its own thread.

Good luck with that $425 Million Dollar bid…

Average NBA Team Valuation Increases By 30 Percent

Please don’t give up on the thread below which has a lot of good points made in it.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

225 Responses to OK This deserves its own thread.

  1. BarelyAble says:

    So I would assume a Seattle team instantly loves into the top ten on this list?

  2. Paul Rogers says:

    So Brian is your thought that, since average franchise value is already $503 million without the Kings sale, Sacramento won’t be able to bid lower due to loan/relocation fees as they have been saying?

  3. Paul Rogers says:

    Actually looking at that list, the franchise value is already $525. Could that be because of the offer?

  4. Matt Parker says:

    The BoG will take the $425mm offer because the fans in Sac are so great and did everything that was asked of them. NBA owners don’t care about money that much.

  5. Myk says:

    The reason all the values are going up is because of the great CBA they bargained last year. Of course, this just proves how silly it is that anyone sided with the owners when they claimed that they were losing money and that players make too much money.

  6. GoSonics79 says:

    This guy clearly doesn’t get it…
    http://www.sbnation.com/2013/1/23/3906724/chris-hansen-sacramento-kings-sale-relocation-seattle
    “That’s not how the NBA works son”
    Hes has to be joking, right? Professional sports owners are always going to go what benefits them and their cities, and in this case thankfully for us is getting back to Seattle and we get our Sonics back.
    And another thought.. How does he know what relationships Hansen/Ballmer have with the league? From the outside looking in I think Hansen has a strong relationship with the NBA and we know Stern loves Ballmer and that’s only going to help our case one would have to believe.

    • cean says:

      If people want to make this personal and say Seattle didn’t do enough, or fight hard enough to keep their team like Sacramento is doing…

      Then they should put their money where their mouth is. Sacramento should bite the bullet and publicly finance the stadium 100% and then turn the building over to the Maloofs as a gift. If they do that, the Maloofs would stay guaranteed.

      Thats exactly what Clay demanded Seattle do. Build a half billion dollar stadium and give it too him for free. Anything less then that was unacceptable and casue for relocation. So call a spade a spade. Anything less then 100% publicly financed stadium solution and you lose the team? Then apparently you no more wanted to keep your team then Seattle did.

      • Jared S. says:

        Or they should build them a new arena every ten years (which is what was asked of us). Seattle has spent more public financing on the NBA alone (to say nothing of the other teams) than Sacramento has ever had.

        And the Kings don’t even have a lease for the NBA to ignore, as they did with us.

        I get really tired of the distortions of why the team left.

    • Seth says:

      This article made me sick. This guy is arrogant and rude. Calling CH son? I mean the way he talks its like Stern is his bff. Maybe this guy is one of those looking for a bunch of clicks. Either way the guy is a moron

  7. Gene Hunt says:

    Chris Daniels ‏@ChrisDaniels5
    Chris Hansen/Steve Ballmer boost average NBA Franchise Values 30 PERCENT? That’s why they (owners) would approve it. #NBAKings #NBASeattle

  8. Gene Hunt says:

    Tony Bizjak ‏@TonyBizjak
    Clock is ticking on Kings future: NBA has begun process of vetting the Hansen group’s financials and sale agreement, source says. #NBAKings

  9. charliesonic says:

    right on, brian. this is why the nba will do NOTHING that ever might lower the value of any franchise. the idea is to drive that up, not go the other direction. . . which to me, spells “S-U-P-E-R-S-O-N-I-C-S.”

  10. Gene Hunt says:

    Chris Daniels ‏@ChrisDaniels5
    RT @cbssports1140: Mayor @KJ_MayorJohnson will speak again today at 2 p.m.

    • Sofa King says:

      Dude is fighting the good fight. Even if the odds are against him.

    • Christopher Michael says:

      Can’t wait to hear about more local businessmen. Or maybe they have a vague pledge by one of the whales now.

      One thing is for sure. KJ is really pushing the PR. Sadly for him this isn’t really registering much outside of Seattle and Sacramento.

    • soundersfan84 says:

      Supposedly according to sactownroyalty

      KJ is gonna talk about more investors.

    • Gene Hunt says:

      Just an update

      Ryan Lillis ‏@Ryan_Lillis
      I realize #NBAKings fans will be #WhaleWatching today at mayor’s press conference. But I think the seas will be quiet.

      • the nightfly says:

        If he doesn’t name any big-money investors, this could backfire. Every time he calls a press conference without a major announcement, he’ll lose stature. Eventually, he’d become “the boy who cried ‘whale’.”

        My guess is, he’s going to get the two guys who have already shown interest (the 24-Hour Fitness guy and the Pens owner), and run a P.R. campaign to convince the world that a dolphin and a tuna together are really a humpback.

  11. SonicsUberAlles says:

    Part of KJ’s strategy is to line up a competitive or matching offer. Doesn’t it seem likely that the Hansen would have foreseen this potential outcome and included in the purchase & sale agreement an option to increase his offer if it was matched?

    • soundersfan84 says:

      After KJ calling hansen’s offer outrageous would they even match it.

    • Christopher Michael says:

      Part of the problem is that the league can’t force the Maloofs to sell to the competing offer. The BOG is going to be deciding on approving the sale and relocation.

      So I’d imagine if they did vote no the agreement would be torn up and the Maloofs would be back to square one. Only with all the extra baggage that would come out of it. At that point matching doesn’t matter since they could entertain offers.

      • rambisfan-rmcd says:

        plus $30 million richer.

      • Mojo says:

        I don’t think you guys get it… Sacramento isn’t thinking the NBA is going to force them to sell the team. What they think/want to happen is that the NBA denies the sale to Hansen and then boxes the Maloofs into a corner because they will have to sell to someone this offseason. They don’t have the money to do it anymore.

        • Christopher Michael says:

          The only way that works is if the NBA says that the Hansen Group is barred from having further negotiations with the Maloofs. And that the Maloofs are barred from negotiations with any group that wants to move the team.

          Not going to happen.

        • Xteve says:

          “What they think/want to happen is that the NBA denies the sale to Hansen and then boxes the Maloofs into a corner because they will have to sell to someone this offseason. They don’t have the money to do it anymore.”

          I can understand that position, but the NBA can’t force an owner to sell to a specific party. Trust us, been there, done that, bought the “Robbed” T-shirt.

      • SonicsUberAlles says:

        Good points CM. My only thought was that maybe by raising his offer above any competitive unsolicited offer, made prior to the BOG decision making process, could be helpful.

    • Xteve says:

      There never was a matching offer. If there was another interested party the Maloofs would have played them against each other to drive the price up.

      Remember it’s not like people didn’t know the Kings were being shopped until two weeks ago or something.

      • Mojo says:

        Huh? The Maloofs stated for years that they would not sell the team. Sure they may have looked into relocation but they always maintained that they would remain as owners. It wasn’t until right around Christmas when rumors began that they would be interested in the selling the team if the price was right. That was the first public indication that they would even consider selling.

        • brettb3 says:

          Actually the stories about them considering Virginia Beach came out well before that.

          • Mojo says:

            Rumors. And 95% of what came out of VB was from the VB media and nobody else. VB was never going to happen, it was just drivel.

          • brettb3 says:

            No doubt it was never going to happen, but they did meet. That’s not a rumor. I guess the larger point is that signs have pointed to the Maloofs being forced to sell for quite some time. There’s no excuse for anybody in Sacramento to be blindsided by this.

          • Mojo says:

            I can agree with that. But what good does that do now? Sacramento might be late to the party but I don’t see why people are blaming them for fighting for their team.

        • BarelyAble says:

          The reports of them being broke have been out for years and at least since fall with VB. Groups could be formed. Hansen has been going for probably a year and a half but also made contact long long ago on the past Sonics saving attempt. They could have lined people up.

          The Mariners are not for sale but everyone knows they are positioned to sell so you can bet people are interested and making calls and arrangements.

        • rydogg says:

          sorry, but if you guys needed public indication that they were for sale then you deserve to be climbing up hill like you are right now. i’m sure no one “behind the scenes” in sac wasn’t aware that they were trying to unload the team for quite some time….denial

        • Paul Rogers says:

          It’s common sense. Hansen didn’t let the Maloofs public statements regarding unwillingness to sell. He approached him and made an offer he couldn’t refuse. Why didn’t Sacramento?

          It was obvious since the day our arena was approved that Hansen would try this. Why didn’t Sacramento investors show more initiative?

        • Xteve says:

          Key words in your statement Mojo: first public indication.

        • LJG says:

          We’ve known, at least it has been obvious since last February, 2012, that the first team that could be available to move would be the Sacramento Kings. We knew and I am sure the the Sacramento leaders knew. Also, no one ever lets it be known that something is for sale. The more you say no, the higher the price goes. What we have here is a savvy buyer, who didn’t get mislead by the Seller’s statements that the team was not for sale.

  12. soundersfan84 says:

    Chris Daniels ‏@ChrisDaniels5
    The only safe bet today is there will be more “whale” talk in Sacramento, than Seattle, and that is unusual. #orca

    Ha!

  13. leBleede says:

    Not sure why, but I’ve spent some time on Sacramento message boards today (not posting of course, just lurking).

    So much anger. Violent hope. Venom. Exactly like us back in the day.

    This whole thing sucks.
    I want the Supes back as bad as anybody.
    But this whole thing f*cking sucks.

  14. Sean says:

    Things are going the way I predicted.

    We’re seeing Sacramento grossly overestimate their chances and hopes (though I think they do have A chance). They firmly believe that this is their thing to lose now, and that Hansen and us are nefarious saboteurs looking to screw them over, and because of that, the vitriol is ramping up big time.

    Only going to get worse from here. I hope Hansen isn’t shaken too much by Ziller’s mean post on his big mean blog.

  15. James says:

    I’ve spent a few minutes myself on Sacramento message boards, and not posting of course. Damn, they are really in denial. But no matter how bleak it looks, you’ve got to try and convince yourself that it isn’t that bleak I guess. Lord knows, we’ve been there.

  16. jason. says:

    all these whale posts on sactown royalty are pretty funny. they seem to think the announcement of a couple billionaires will just automatically save the franchise.

  17. Mojo says:

    we have the signed peice of paper. why are you guys so concered about what Sacramento is doing?

  18. Brian Robinson says:

    I will be completely perplexed if he holds this press conference and does not definitively identify his investors and their level of commitment.

  19. rambisfan-rmcd says:

    “I don’t have much to say today, any questions?” KJ

  20. BarelyAble says:

    I am sorry, but the next press conference will be that they are giving up. Basically saying that there are multiple people and they have had discussions with lots of people and making progress. Won’t actually discuss the nature of the progress. I just think it is over if this is how it is going to be.

  21. Taylor Made says:

    multiple ownership groups, multiple arena “ideas” (not plans). What a mess.

    • SonicsDawg says:

      If the Stern-era NBA is known for one consistent theme it’s “process.” The NBA values ownership groups and cities who work with the NBA and go through the long arena-financing process. It would be unusual for the NBA to reject the Seattle offer for such an uncertain, last-second plan from Sactown.

      But I suppose never say never. KJ is politically connected all the way to the top. So if anyone can get the NBA to buck their own precedent, it is he.

  22. danabarrosetc says:

    Hadn’t heard KJ discuss possibility of building arena *without* NBA team before. Interesting.

  23. BarelyAble says:

    Now has said that they think an arena will work without a team and that is a sign that people are interested in the market. I just don’t get what he is talking about on the arena front here. Seems like they don’t really have a deal in place like is being reported but an idea of how they would like it to be.

  24. MarkS says:

    KJ’s a typical politician - can’t give a straight answer.

  25. Taylor Made says:

    He’s talking about bidders. There is no bidding. The team is sold.

  26. BarelyAble says:

    Now he is saying that the deepest pockets don’t end up as the deepest bidder. The sale already has happened! There is no bidding!

    • Menace says:

      This isnt ebay

    • the nightfly says:

      Here’s an interesting legal question: Say KJ convinces Larry Ellison to come in and offer $400 million for that 65% share, plus letting them have some control in the running of the team. Now, there is a binding sales contract in place but suppose, say, the Maloofs make it clear to the rest of the owners that they wouldn’t mind if the Hansen offer gets rejected, so they could sell to Ellison. The BoG, accordingly, rejects the sale and lets the Maloofs make a new deal with Ellison. Would the $30 million deposit mean that Hansen could then sue the Maloofs (as well as Ellison, the city, and the NBA, of course) for tortious interference?

  27. Sofa King says:

    Those poor bastards, they are flailing in the water. I may be a selfish prick but I am glad I am not on that side this time.

  28. rambisfan-rmcd says:

    Question, “KJ, who do you think the Sonics should draft? a PG or a big man?”

  29. Taylor Made says:

    “March 1 is when they would apply for… a sale.”

    Um… that was done 3 days ago, KJ.

  30. jason. says:

    im not sure hes said “playing to win” enough.

  31. BarelyAble says:

    Tired of the argument that no team has been sold where the fans have done everything and the city supported the team. I don’t see how that matters at all really.

  32. MarkS says:

    God bless KJ. He tries.

  33. Menace says:

    Ill give it up to the Sacramento reporters. They are asking good questions. Unfortunately for them the answers are vague or “I dont know”.

  34. jason. says:

    “fair and competitve” = LESS. no deal.

  35. BarelyAble says:

    intimating an offer of lesser value will be favorable to the owners.

  36. Taylor Made says:

    This is hard to listen to. He keeps talking about presenting an offer and saying the Maloofs will want to hear all offers before they agree to a deal. How does he not know that the deal has already been agreed to?

  37. BarelyAble says:

    It is done, saying the “whales” are trying to understand the economics of it. Actually has a call with Stern tomorrow.

  38. rambisfan-rmcd says:

    “My goal is to reel in the whales by as early as next week “hopefully.” As early as Monday and as late as Sunday.”

  39. Kevin Nesgoda says:

    I want a mayor who ends a press conference with, “I gotta roll.”

  40. Brian Robinson says:

    So as of yesterday he hoped to announce his “whale” by the end of the week. There are a couple of things I heard him say here that would scare the crap out of me: 1) I hope to be able to announce investors NEXT WEEK. 2) We are back to considering multiple arena sites 3) Investors are indicating that a downtown arena makes sense WHETHER THERE IS A TEAM OR NOT 4) The highest bidder does not always win.

    That was a setback. I am completely perplexed. Major momentum loss in last 48 hours.

    • SonicBoom says:

      Maybe positioning to build an arena to lure next relocation? He kept hammering “this is an NBA market.” Like he’s trying to remind the national media that Sacto isn’t a cow town, and they should be at front of line?

      I dunno, just thinking aloud.

    • Menace says:

      Yeah. He didnt just take a step back today. He turned around and ran.

      I gotta roll (KJ voice)

    • rambisfan-rmcd says:

      “Major momentum loss in last 48 hours.”..never knew there ever was any. This seemed like another North Korean “delayed” rocket launch.

    • korboko says:

      1) How is the arena plan done, if they still considering multiple arena sites?

      2. Why mention that a downtown arena makes whatever there is a team or not. Is he looking for a expansion team if the BOG agrees with the deal?

  41. SonicBoom says:

    How likely do you all think that on his call with the Commissioner tomorrow, Stern will say “Kevin, you don’t need to update me any more… I very much respect all that you are doing, but its over. It’s time to give this up…”

  42. payton2kemp says:

    hey guys, I want to buy my neighbor’s car he already agreed to sell it to an out of towner for 5250. But im playing to win and ill make a fair and competitive offer around 4000 because I feel the car has always been a part of this neighborhood and would hate for it to leave. Im currently talking to friends and family to help me reach $4000. He has to sell it to me right, im his neighbor why would he do such a thing by selling to outsiders for an outrageous price.

  43. jason. says:

    if he wants any chance of success he needs to replace “fair and competitive” with “blow them out of the water”

  44. Sean says:

    I almost got the impression that KJ was simultaneously pushing the “it’s not over” manta and walking back expectations.

  45. kba says:

    It will be interesting what he will talk about with Stern. I hope he can stop this nonsense.

  46. Sofa King says:

    The real question is who actually owns the team at this point? If the Maloofs still control the club there is always the (albeit slim) chance that if the money is right they could sell local and slink off into the shadows without being a national pariah.

    What I am saying is don’t get overconfident. It’s unflattering.

  47. MarkS says:

    Stern will just pat him on the head and say, “That’s good KJ, very nice KJ, have a nice day.”

  48. Taylor Made says:

    I’m honestly concerned that KJ is unaware there is a finalized deal at the NBA offices.

  49. Paul Rogers says:

    Maybe KJ can’t find a whale. But here is a sea lion that is available from up north…

    http://www.timescolonist.com/photo-1-600-pound-sea-lion-washes-up-on-nanaimo-shore-1.54656

  50. Taylor Made says:

    KJ keeps saying he was looking for 3 to 5 people to chip in $1 million a piece. Imagine if THAT had been his press conference!

  51. Peter says:

    That’s what I hope happens. we get kings, SAC gets next relocation if they get their act together. That model worked for us, it may just work for them. But I agree, if they are talking about an arena there without a tenant, it’s over for them.

  52. rambisfan-rmcd says:

    From a message board on the Bee
    “34 years of accounting and M&A mergers. Real “whales” like Burkle, Hansen, Ballmer never do business this way.”

  53. Gene Hunt says:

    It doesn’t sound like I missed anything by not watching the press conference.

  54. Paul Rogers says:

    What really stinks is the NBA created this with two acts stubborness overcoming logic.

    Had logic been followed from the beginning, the Hornets would be in OKC, the Sonics would still be in Seattle, the Maloofs would have no leverage of any kind, and a Sacramento ownership group would have a much better chance of keeping the Kings in town right now.

    If logic would’ve been followed the second time, the NBA would’ve been open to waiting one year before settling the Hornets situation and Hansen could’ve moved them to Seattle from a city without a consistent history of supporting its team.

    • Jared S. says:

      I think the Hornets should still be in Charlotte (although I guess the name may be coming back soon) and the Grizzlies in Vancouver.

      But I agree with your larger point. And if a team moves from somewhere else to Sacramento in a few years, it’ll really make the NBA seem fly-by-night.

    • kinsesu says:

      Amen !! Why didn’t they just consult us - — we could’ve had this all properly settled long ago.

  55. Paul Rogers says:

    But we are where we are. It is what it is. And other meaningless truisms.

  56. korboko says:

    This reminds me when the Atlanta Thrashers was sold to Winnipeg. Atlanta, believe it or not had local owners that wanted to buy the Thrashers.

  57. Xteve says:

    “People of Sacramento! You may be wondering why I called this press conference …. I just saved a ton of money on my car insurance by switching to Geico!”

  58. rambisfan-rmcd says:

    So if the roles were reversed and the Maloofs sell to a Sacramento buyer would Hansen ever say “Wait, Steve and I can offer more money, we have a bigger market, hear us out at the BOG even though you have a binding agreement w Burkle McWhale??

  59. Sofa King says:

    It looks like the system is just weeding out bad owners. Shinn, Schultz, now Maloof. Fans are getting the hard rigid and veiny shaft but the league is actually better off.

  60. SonicsDawg says:

    My theory is Stern telling KJ that ONLY chance sacto has to get an expansion team is to get a billionaire ownership group and arena “plan” in place ASAP and utilize the sympathetic press coverage of sactown’s plight (and KJ’s political connections) to almost force an expansion promise out of the BOG in return for graciously laying down their swords in the Seattle-sacto battle.

    Even Grant Napear floating the expansion-to-Sacramento theory after pushing the Seattle-expansion theory the last couple weeks. Not to mention KJ talking about building an arena even if Kings leave. Seems to me KJ knows the nba can’t decide who the Maloofs sell to, but his Hail Mary is really about expansion…

    • Paul Rogers says:

      I still wonder whether expansion is an option at all. The ironic thing is that I don’t think it is an option at all for Seattle in the next five years. If it’s an option for the Kings, it’s because Hansen will have forced the NBA’s hand. If expansion is available for Sacramento (which I really hope it is), it will be because the NBA won’t want another relocation black eye.

      • Christopher Michael says:

        There seems to be too many issues with teams in the league right now for expansion.

      • SonicBoom says:

        See my post below, but I think Hansen’s offer/valuation is so high because he knows expansion IS NOT a possibility.

        Seattle is a (black eye) market that leaves a gaping hole on NBA, but honestly, and a total dick comment, but if Kings are to leave Sac, while it would totally devastate that city’s fans, I think in 5 years, the league would not feel the wound outside of NorCal. Similar to how the league does not feel a wound from leaving KC to Sac.

        Sac works because it is there, but don’t know if its a city in a vacuum, that the NBA would be looking at if the Kings didn’t move there in the 80′s.

        That’s why KJ kept on saying “this is an NBA market”… if no Kings, then that may be quickly forgotten.

    • Xteve says:

      Expansion is not happening guys.

      You will see an NBA team on the Moon before you see an expansion team in Sacramento, or anywhere else.

  61. SonicBoom says:

    Total speculation on my part, but I really do believe (just seeing the care and precision that Hansen operates) that the 77 million IS NOT part of the $525M valuation. Nor is the relocation fee. The valuation is a blow your socks off offer to: wrangle the Maloofs, show the NBA we are more than serious, and reflects the unique situation of the Kings (that they are without lease).

    • Sean says:

      100% agree.

      Nobody says “well, I value this franchise at $448 million….wait..what? They OWE an additional $77 million, then wow, that raises the worth of this thing up to 525.”

      I don’t think a debt would increase a valuation. Paying off a debt could be part of an increased sales price, but not a valuation of a franchise.

    • SonicsUberAlles says:

      Agree. Sounds like the $77M loan is between the new team owners and the city and the $30M relocation fee is between the relocating owners (H-B) and the NBA. In other words, these amounts are not between the new owners and the Maloof’s and are unlikely reflected in the H-B/Maloof purchase and sale agreement.

      • SonicBoom says:

        Also- the league sets relocation fee. So $30M is just estimate. Maybe Clay makes good and sets fee to $0. Perhaps because Seattle has lost a team, not a brand new NBA city fee is at $0… regardless, it’ll be interesting to see what that number really is.

  62. Sofa King says:

    Maybe one of them….is a wizard

  63. Myk says:

    If expansion was an option for Sacramento it would make no sense for the league to not offer it to Seattle instead and then not worry about the potential issue of moving a second franchise.

    This should be your best evidence that expansion isn’t happening any time soon.

    • Xteve says:

      I really don’t understand why people keep bringing expansion up. It makes zero sense from anyone’s perspective.

      • Paul Rogers says:

        Because the word keeps coming up in Sacramento. Carmichael Dave even tweeted today that if the city were offered expansion in 2 years he would take that deal right now.

        I don’t think it’s going to happen, but the issue is still there.

  64. SonicBoom says:

    I’ll bet that expansion keeps coming up, because KJ has dialed in this statement as his best ‘talking point.’ He loves to say “I think Seattle should get a team (looks sympathetic to nation’s view of the well publicized Seattle-hose job), just not ours (seems reasonable, implying expansion is best option).’

    • Xteve says:

      KJ can talk about it all he wants. Until he or anyone else thinks they can convince 32 NBA owners that dividing the revenue pie into smaller slices in order to put more teams into shaky markets is a good idea, it’s not happening.

      • soundersfan84 says:

        32? When did NBA expand?

      • the nightfly says:

        Actually, after the new CBO, it is quite possible the league will be expanding soon (as in a couple of years from now). In fact, before the Kings purchase came down, I heard a number of reporters and NBA-watchers concur that, with the labor situation settled, the league will be looking at expansion sooner rather than later.

        • soundersfan84 says:

          I believe i heard/read that spitting the pie 31 times will negate the expansion fee that the league would get so essentially they wouldn’t be making money by expanding.

          • the nightfly says:

            As I point out below, I’ve heard otherwise (whether correctly or not, I can’t say). Keep in mind that intelligently-chosen expansion eould lead to a larger amount of revenue to share, so it isn’t just a matter of dividing up the same poe into smaller slices Also, if they’re going to expand, it will be to 32 teams, as adding just one team would be a logistical nightmare, as we’ve already seen in MLS.

        • Mike Baker says:

          By “soon” you would be talking 5 years from now, or more.

          The 30 owners do not want to take a smaller slice of the revenue pie, and that is what expansion means.

          • the nightfly says:

            No, by “soon,” I’m talking about two years. This came, as I noted, from radio and print citations of people in a better position to know than either of us. Now, those people might be wrong in their estimation, but don’t try telling me what I “really mean” when I mean no such thing

          • Mike Baker says:

            Well, no, that was from people repeating twitter comments.

            Would you like 1/30th of basketball related income, or 1/32nd?
            That the question you ask the other owners when you talk about expanding.
            The markets you expand to must produce a net positive to the BRI.

            David Stern himself has commented that expansion is not going to happen in the near term.
            Until the current CBA is completely implemented and the league has experienced what the limited profit sharing really looks like, they are not diluting the pool with more owners. That’s beyond 2015.

            Until the unstable teams like the Bucks have an arena plan, one way or another, the league is not going to expand.

            You will see 3 teams figure things out before a serious discussion of expanding happens. That’s not likely going to be settled within the 2 year twitter wishing suggests.

            Forgive me for giving you the impression that I was putting words in your mouth. That wasn’t my intention. What I meant to do is tell you that you are flat fucking wrong.

  65. A Friendly Minnesotan says:

    In other news, it looks like New Orleans is officially changing to the Pelicans for next season.
    Hopefully the Bobcats change to the Hornets again!

    Sonics plus the Charlotte Hornets back in the NBA would be amazing!

  66. leBleede says:

    I notice that a lot of people are hanging hats on the “legally binding” agreement between Hansen and the Maloofs. Have these papers been made public?
    Folks are talking about that agreement with bulletproof confidence…like they’ve read the agreement or something.

    • soundersfan84 says:

      Only Hansen’s group, maloofs and the NBA has seen the document.

    • Paul Rogers says:

      Haven’t been made public, I’ll let the first paragraph of Hansen’s public statement from sonicsarena.com speak for itself…

      We are happy to announce that we have entered into a binding agreement with the Maloofs to purchase a controlling interest in the Sacramento Kings NBA franchise. The sale is obviously subject to approval by the NBA Board of Governors, and we look forward to working with the League in the coming months to consummate the transaction.

      I’m pretty confident a guy like Hansen isn’t going to release a public statement that isn’t true.

      • Paul Rogers says:

        If that’s not enough, there’s this from the NBA’s statement…

        The NBA received an executed Purchase and Sale Agreement for the transfer of a controlling interest in the Sacramento Kings from the Maloof family to an investor group led by Christopher Hansen. The proposed transaction is subject to the approval of the NBA Board of Governors and has been referred to the Board’s committee process for review.

        So yes. It’s an “executed purchase and sale agreement”, which is binding between the parties.

      • Otto says:

        Many sacto fans believe it is not a binding agreement

    • Christopher Michael says:

      It was submitted to the league. It includes 30 million paid in advance. It includes all sorts of details for the league to go over.

      We call it binding because it is a signed deal. I don’t think any of us are contract lawyers but I do know you typically can’t back out of an agreement without some consequence (whether the consequence is part of contract law or specifically stated in the agreement).

  67. Sonicsman says:

    leBleede, Chris Hansen himself told us it was a “binding” agreement. We are only going on what he says…..

    http://www.sonicsarena.com

  68. Eric E says:

    What will be the main fan site once a team is in Seattle? This one? Any chance of a sweet mobile app?! lol

  69. hughc5 says:

    Man i wish i could overhear the kj/stern phone call

  70. Peter says:

    I think they should approve the sale before the move. maybe over all-star break. then the vote would be a formality. the BOG meeting in April would be a lot less messy, hopefully.

  71. Peter says:

    As soon as Stern speaks on this, we should know how this is gonna go down. BOG will do whatever Stern wants.

    • Christopher Michael says:

      The BOG really has no reason to do what Stern wants. The BOG is going to do what is in their best interest. Which is going with the already signed agreement and not getting involved any further.

      Has any of the owners come out to Sacramento’s defense? I haven’t seen any reports that they have.

  72. TheDude says:

    Rambisfan posted this a little ways up the page:

    ‘From a message board on the Bee
    “34 years of accounting and M&A mergers. Real “whales” like Burkle, Hansen, Ballmer never do business this way.”’

    This is just so true. There’s a reason why the Hansen deal seemed to come out of thin air to Sacramento folk. It’s the same reason everyone was taken completely off guard with the announcement that Disney had purchased Star Wars. Literally nobody saw that coming when it happened a couple of months back.

    Why? Because billionaire businessmen didn’t get to where they are in their lives by winning press conferences and doing their business in public like the mayor of Sacramento is currently attempting.

    • kinsesu says:

      Very good point.

      Geez, I wish Stern/NBA would put an end to this circus — - for both Sac & Sea fans. I’m sure the Kings players and staff would also like this settled.

  73. 79 Sonics Forever says:

    I listened to KJ conference today and then Grant Napers show afterward. It seem that something changed in the last 24 hours and they are a little more apprehensive about the King Staying. Part of the problem is they really don’t no the details of Hansens deal. Also I think they realize they are running out of time to put a proposal together. Like stated above these deals are complex and no matter how much money you have you need to make a return.

  74. Paul Rogers says:

    If KJ is trying to rally the troops, today’s press conference was a big mistake. The board I just looked at had a very melancholy tone to it. They sense KJ is starting to back down and prep for a future return, which they don’t think would ever happen.

  75. jenn_gp says:

    I’m loving how active our boards become lately. While the topic of what we’ve been discussing has been…you guessed it…a bit of a roller coaster with ups and downs, it’s still been fun catching up on all the comments after a long day at work.

    And another press conference from KJ? Unless he’s ready to name his big whales, I don’t get the point. Like someone else posted earlier, I’m dying to hear he phone call between KJ and Stern.

    • kinsesu says:

      Yeah, I’m probably a bit obsessed — - when I get home from work, can’t wait to catch up on the boards. Hopefully, we will be having a celebration get-together soon.

      KJ’s press conferences are embarassing. Gotta admire him for his effort. I so hope Stern advises him that the buzzer has sounded. Go ahead KJ - get your ducks in a row for the next team for sale. Saddest part is - I just don’t think Sac will get another team.

  76. rambisfan-rmcd says:

    Grant Napier kept salivating over The Chris Daniels Oct article R/t expansion today on his show. (For Seattle Of course)

    http://www.king5.com/news/arena/Stern-doesnt-know-where-Seattle-NBA-team-would-come-from-175831571.html

  77. Sonicsman says:

    The way I see it now, if Sacramento steps up with an offer then Stern is going to have to force expansion for Seattle onto the owners for next season. If Sac wins and Seattle is left with no team he would create the worst nightmare of his legacy. No way he will go out like that.

  78. jenn_gp says:

    Someone on the Kingsfans forum just said the agreement can’t be binding until a 3rd party approves it. Anyone want to explain this one? I thought it was binding because the Maloofs and Hansen have signed an agreement?

    • Taylor Made says:

      The league has to approve it. But it’s still binding
      Neither party can back out unless it is rejected.

      • jenn_gp says:

        This is what I thought, just wanted to double check. I don’t know where Sac fans are getting their info.

        Chris wouldn’t publicly state the sale was binding if it wasn’t true…he’s been 100% honest every step of the way, when he’s willing to divulge info.

        • hughc5 says:

          Sounds like theyre desperate and grasping for straws. They also gotta realize that this sale was looked over by the league before it was singned and turned in, do you think the old lawyer stern missed the little poison pill down payment in there? I dont. I wonder howmuch the league is influencing it. My guess would be quit a bit…..

    • SMK206 says:

      FYI, Jenn, if you’re interested in Sactown forums, you should be reading sactownroyalty.com instead of Kingsfans.com. Sactown Royalty has about 100 times as much activity.

  79. Mike Baker says:

    Expand and fill the holes and the Bucks, Pacers, Bobcats, Timberwolves, etc, lose leverage in negotiating near term and up and coming negotiations. They lose value as well.

    • kinsesu says:

      Baker, as always - — of course you are right.

      Still trying to figure how the league is going to get out of this with the least amount of PR damage. KJ/Sac will need to gracefully come up short, back off and plan for the next team sale. Stern will not want to be put in the position of turning KJ/Sac away if they came a competitive offer. Not approving/rejecting Sea to accept a Sac bid would also be huge PR nightmare and an expensive legal mess.

  80. Gene Hunt says:

    Chris Daniels ‏@ChrisDaniels5
    Sacramento Mayor Kevin Johnson is at tonight’s Kings game. 1st game since team was sold to Seattle group: http://ow.ly/i/1pJ2F

    I’m watching the Kings vs Suns game right now. Sleep Train arena looks about half empty and the crowd hasn’t really been into the game at all so far.

  81. Mike Baker says:

    New thread is up.

    This one was getting long.

Leave a Reply